Today, I checked in over at the new Daily Fire Fix, where you can get a quick audio of today's happenings in the fire service. They're also on iTunes.
One of their stories covered a subject near and dear to my heart, and what I believe is to be THE fire service story of 2012.
No, I'm not talking about who the real fire critic is, or who fathered him. Sorry to disappoint, that's already being covered.
I know, I feel the same way.
Anyway, I’m talking about the burgeoning heated debates on victim survivability profiling.
There seems to be room for seating only on the two extreme sides of the fence on this one- be too safe, or too aggressive. Why just two sides? Are we so closed-minded that we can’t consider there may be an alternative to this black and white thinking?
Can we just agree that we need to be SMARTER- instead of demonizing the Safety Sallys, or Testosterone Induced Warriors? If the thought of developing a few more synapses to a few more brain cells is daunting to you, then maybe you ought to consider making your “second job” your only job. Because we can’t give up on the thinking that is needed now more than ever.
We don’t have the same staffing, the same leaders, the same fires,- NOTHING IS AS IT WAS just 5 years ago folks. Like it or not, the way we think about the fireground doesn’t apply anymore.
The game board has changed. If we can’t change with it, we’re heading for what one Chief has called 2012’s Perfect Storm.
Check out “Billy Goldfeder’s ‘More Facts, Less Emotion” to read why we need to change the way we have been looking at the way we operate, specifically on the “go-no-go” situation.
Then lighten up, Francis, and get thinking.